Discussion:
[MapProxy] S3 cache
BERÉNYI Attila
2017-03-22 15:05:16 UTC
Permalink
Hi

I'm just about to give the S3 cache backend a go (
https://mapproxy.org/docs/nightly/caches.html#s3), but I was wondering
whether anyone uses it in production already?
If so, any pros or cons that I should consider?

@Oliver - any roadmap or anticipated release date for 1.10?

Cheers
--
BERÉNYI Attila, PhD
ÃŒgyvezető

GISLab Consulting Kft.
H-1031 Budapest, Kadosa utca 59.

M: +36 20 457 1800
W: http://gislab.hu
Martin Kokes
2017-03-23 17:57:09 UTC
Permalink
Hi
I'm just about to give the S3 cache backend a go (https://mapproxy.org/docs/nightly/caches.html#s3), but I was wondering whether anyone uses it in production already?
If so, any pros or cons that I should consider?
Hi Attila,

if you're looking for performance (and don't need accelerate WMS
requests), I'd rather go for nginx with some rewrite rules to pass
maproxy (and any further script processing) completely and access
directly the filesystem in TileCache cache structure (of course, best on
NVMe SSD) with try_files for cached tiles. You'll get amazing almost
CDN-like performance with etag on; if_modified_since before; access_log
off; for cached tiles ... at leave absent tiles on mapproxy.

Martin
BERÉNYI Attila
2017-03-24 15:03:56 UTC
Permalink
Hi Martin - thanks for getting back to me.

Currently I have more-or-less the same setup with nginx - one thing that
could speed up things - that I've added to my setup - is ZFS.

However, I'm still interested in S3...I'll get to it as soon as I can, and
I'll share some benchmark results with you all.

Cheers
Post by BERÉNYI Attila
Hi
I'm just about to give the S3 cache backend a go (
https://mapproxy.org/docs/nightly/caches.html#s3), but I was wondering
whether anyone uses it in production already?
If so, any pros or cons that I should consider?
Hi Attila,
if you're looking for performance (and don't need accelerate WMS
requests), I'd rather go for nginx with some rewrite rules to pass maproxy
(and any further script processing) completely and access directly the
filesystem in TileCache cache structure (of course, best on NVMe SSD) with
try_files for cached tiles. You'll get amazing almost CDN-like performance
with etag on; if_modified_since before; access_log off; for cached tiles
... at leave absent tiles on mapproxy.
Martin
_______________________________________________
MapProxy mailing list
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapproxy
--
BERÉNYI Attila, PhD
ÃŒgyvezető

GISLab Consulting Kft.
H-1031 Budapest, Kadosa utca 59.

M: +36 20 457 1800
W: http://gislab.hu
Continue reading on narkive:
Loading...